default qualification in Larch/C?

To: horning
Subject: default qualification in Larch/C?
From: leavens@cs.iastate.edu (Gary Leavens)
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 93 16:47:57 CST
In-Reply-To: horning@src.dec.com's message of Fri, 05 Mar 93 11:53:13 -0800 <9303051953.AA07655@roustabout.pa.dec.com>

Jim,
	We'll have to think about this some more.  Thanks for your reply.
I think there may be other reasons for preferring the LCL defaults...
and we're looking at more examples.  (Too bad C++ isn't Modula-3.)
	Gary

Reference(s):

Re: default qualification in Larch/C?

From: horning

Prev: alternative to "trashed"
Next: Semantics of trashed
Index: Larch archive index