Re: Puzzling syntax


Just to make sure I'm not completely around the bend here:

1.  What I take to be the kludge in question is the phrase

   [traitRef+, genPartition] eqSeq

2.  I meant to be asking not for an improvement to that phrase,
but for its elimination.  (Obviously, *eliminating* the option
isn't going to introduce an ambiguity if there's none there now.)
I still don't see any great need to have it at all.

Am I misinterpreting your reply?

- David